Re: Processed: your mail
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> noowner 185943
> noowner 208010
> noowner 208011
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:31:24 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owner'
> > (regardless of the fact that there isn't another good way just at the
> > moment).
> "The owner of a bug claims responsibility for fixing it [...]"
> I thought I tried to do this.
I'm not sure I understand how you can claim responsibility for fixing
(i.e. uploading new policy, rather than just sending a patch for) a
policy bug ...?
Well, whatever. Hopefully we'll have subscription sometime soon.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]