[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#209855: [PROPOSAL] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote



On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:22:55PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> --------------------------
> --- CVS/debian-policy/policy.sgml	Sat Aug 23 22:23:53 2003
> +++ policy.sgml	Tue Sep  9 17:27:00 2003
> @@ -3648,10 +3648,18 @@
>  
>  	<p>
>  	  If there is no most recently configured version
> -	  <prgn>dpkg</prgn> will pass a null argument; older versions
> -	  of dpkg may pass <tt>&lt;unknown&gt;</tt> (including the
> -	  angle brackets) in this case.  Even older ones do not pass a
> -	  second argument at all, under any circumstances.
> +	  <prgn>dpkg</prgn> will pass a null argument.
> +	    <footnote>
> +	      <p>
> +                Historical note: Truly ancient (pre-1997) versions of
> +                <prgn>dpkg</prgn> passed <tt>&lt;unknown&gt;</tt> (including
> +                the angle brackets) in this case.  Even older ones did not
> +                pass a second argument at all, under any circumstance.  Note
> +                that upgrades using such an old dpkg version are unlikely to
> +                work for other reasons, even if this old argument behavior
> +                is handled by your postinst script.
> +	      </p>
> +	    </footnote>
>  	</p>
>        </sect>

Seconded.  Until and unless I say otherwise, the footnote text can be
amended arbitrarily, or even deleted entirely, without invalidating my
second.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     Organized religion is a sham and a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     crutch for weak-minded people who
branden@debian.org                 |     need strength in numbers.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Jesse Ventura

Attachment: pgpl4cIk1gUZU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: