[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#96873: Bug#208990: ardour-gtk: Providing 'ladspa-host'


[Sat, 06 Sep 2003] David García Garzón wrote:
> Thanks for the informative link and sorry for the noise into the bugtracking 
> system. I agree that ladspa-host is not very useful for dependency checking, 
> althought is not as basic as the mentioned glibc, but it is useful for 
> package searching.
> I am doing an article about alsa-ladspa-jack and i was searching for a list of 
> possible host to try. ladspa-host only pointed to ladspa-sdk, galan and 
> ecasound. 

You could do the following:

rj@schuh:~$ grep-available -F Suggests,Recommends,Depends -s Package ladspa-plugin
Package: snd-dmotif
Package: xmms-ladspa
Package: sweep
Package: glame
Package: galan
Package: ecasound2.2
Package: snd
Package: libardour0
Package: libecasound7c102

Not much though...
> Maybe a deb-tag is more useful for such purposes. But anyway ladspa-host 
> should exist or not exist at all. Do you agree with me in that point?

Sure. True.

> On Dissabte 06 Setembre 2003 20:45, you wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > [Sat, 06 Sep 2003] David García Garzón wrote:
> > > This packages should provide the ladspa-host virtual package since it
> > > can be used as such.
> >
> > Please read
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=96873
> >
> > on a discussion about this. There is no real use.
> > I will close this report and reopen if you have new input on this.
> > I hope you are OK with that.
> >
> >
> >     Robert.

Attachment: pgpCQmzY_69LI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: