Re: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:09:41PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The LSB init script policy also says that all distro init script names
> must be registered with LANANA, which is a total crock.
That certainly would be the case for Debian initscripts, but I fail to
see why it would be a problem for LSB initscripts. Whereas in Debian,
namespace conflicts are a bug by definition (policy 10.1), this is not
the case for LSB packages. Since namespace conflicts are always a
problem, it's nice that they're using LANANA to resolve that (by
ensuring it never happens).
--
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org
"Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation."
"So is my neck, stop it anyway!"
-- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
Reply to: