Bug#203728: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] Please add virtual package myspell-dictionary)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400
with message-id <E19p8hO-000121-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#203728: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2003 03:00:22 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Thu Jul 31 22:00:19 2003
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from stan.ping.de [62.72.95.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19iQ9S-0001sY-00; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:00:19 -0500
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19iQ9R-0000Ty-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:00:17 +0200
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 04:57:56 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian-policy: please add virtual package myspell-dictionary
Message-ID: <20030801025756.GA30714@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org, dict-common-dev@lists.alioth.debian.org
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.20
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Rene Engelhard <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-23.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_DEBBUGS_CC
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.0
Severity: wishlist
virtual-package-list.txt.gz says:
"1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
package debian-policy."
Here it is :)
[ sorry for the duplicate, I misread the list as I should mail -devel
and -policy and not mail -devel and _file a bug_ against the debian-policy
package... ]
Proposal:
--- virtual-package-names-list.txt.old 2003-07-31 02:04:23.000000000 +0200
+++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2003-07-31 02:14:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
dict-server the Dictionary Server
info-browser something that can browse GNU Info files
ispell-dictionary a dictionary for the ispell system
+ myspell-dictionary a dictionary for the myspell system
man-browser something that can read man pages
wordlist a /usr/share/dict/words (*)
www-browser something that can browse HTML files
The new policy for the former openoffice.org-spellcheck-* packages
(included in the "Debian Spelling Dictionaries and Tools Policy")
has written in it that they should provide myspell-dictionary
and myspell-dictionary-* (that's a special exception for
the openoffice.org-l10n-* packages to suggests an matching dictionary)
and openoffice.org / mozilla-spellchecker[1] / ... should
suggest/recommend/... myspell-dictionary.
I think that is just a logical approach seeing that we already
have aspell-dictionary and ispell-dictionary...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #2 Fre Jun 27 15:46:02 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro
-- no debconf information
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Kdc0+FmQsCSK63MRAm5nAJ9LbeTH8JRtFlTgKCvYT3dRnB710gCeOQnm
Zt7NxDppVkTKowtE2odnaHA=
=JEdp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203728-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2003 15:53:31 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Tue Aug 19 10:53:18 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19p8nK-0003Sm-00; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:53:14 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19p8hO-000121-00; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
To: 203728-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#203728: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0
Message-Id: <E19p8hO-000121-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400
Delivered-To: 203728-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
debian-policy_3.6.1.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.1.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.6.1.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.1.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.6.1.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.1.0_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 203728@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> (supplier of updated debian-policy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:28:10 -0500
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.6.1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description:
debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents
Closes: 176506 187250 187297 188030 193748 200440 203728
Changes:
debian-policy (3.6.1.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
Josip:
* Removed obsolete section on obsolete constructs and libraries,
closes: #193748.
Manoj:
* Change reference to the debconf introduction from kitenet to a debian
hosted server. closes: Bug#187297
* Added myspell-dictionary to the virtual packages list closes: Bug#203728
* Fix the restart action in the init.d/bind example; it now uses
--oknodo so that the action does not fail when the service is not
running. closes: Bug#187250
* invoke-rc.d and update-rc.d are now in the sysv-rc package instead of
the sysvinit package. Fixed a reference in policy. closes: Bug#200440
* Note that postinst abort-remove is called if there is an error while
removing the package. closes: Bug#188030
* [AMENDMENT 2003/08/03] Make Debconf the standard for prompting the
user closes: Bug#176506
Files:
1a03f67a3afd331c290c41f5c0008441 798 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.1.0.dsc
7dbe3ca1df000212517bf29b0453aad2 569342 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.1.0.tar.gz
3759654780361dbc9f52c426e1e13c4f 1209866 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.1.0_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/QjmHIbrau78kQkwRAtvCAJ99asWbl2v9zHG2jsmkuLVSZPellwCg7YNN
YFv3iDq+wOgmgFf8suEQ274=
=wEzD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: