[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#172436: followup on browser proposal

Ok, discussion turned up two problems, fixable by changing two words:

   Web browsers

   Some programs have the ability to launch a web browser to display an URL.
   Since there are lots of different web browsers available in the Debian
   distribution, the system administrator and each user should have the
   possibility to choose a preferred web browser.
   In addition, programs should choose a good default web browser if none
   is selected by the user or system administrator.
|  Thus, every program that launches a web browser with an URL should use the
   BROWSER environment variable to determine what browser the user wishes
   to use.
   The value of BROWSER may consist of a colon-separated series of browser
   command parts. These should be tried in order until one succeeds. Each command
   part may optionally contain the string "%s"; if it does, the URL to be viewed
   is substituted there. If a command part does not contain %s, the browser is to
   be launched as if the URL had been supplied as its first argument. The string
   %% must be substituted as a single %
   This browser variable was proposed by Eric Raymond at
|  If the BROWSER environment variable is not set, the program can use
   /usr/bin/x-www-browser if DISPLAY is set,
   and /usr/bin/www-browser if not. These two files are managed through the dpkg
   alternatives mechanism. Thus every package providing a general-purpose
   web browser must call the update-alternatives program to register
   the appopriate one of these alternatives.
   Instead of implementing the above in every program that runs a web browser,
   programs in Debian may be configured to use /usr/bin/sensible-browser .
   This is a program provided by the Debian base system that checks
   the BROWSER environment variable, and falls back to /usr/bin/x-www-browser
   or /usr/bin/www-browser if it is not set.
In other words, we won't make BROWSER mandatory yet, since a few programs
still need to implement it (I suspect gnome and kde are the most
prominent that do not support BROWSER yet). And I have clarified the
advice about how a program can work out a default browser to use, by
avoiding a restricted word.

I hope this is enough to get it seconded yet again, and into policy.

see shy jo

Attachment: pgpV_usjloSps.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: