[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#194974: [PROPOSAL] add Games/Simulation to menu subpolicy



On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:55:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> I noticed that the majority of packages that create a new second-level
> menu (in violation of policy) are in Games/Simulation.

The whole point of keeping menu policy separate was so that it would
be easy to modify without all the overhead of making formal policy
changes.  I'm a little perturbed that we seem to have lost that.

> --- menu-policy.sgml.old	2003-05-27 20:40:31.000000000 -0400
> +++ menu-policy.sgml	2003-05-27 20:54:41.000000000 -0400
> @@ -208,6 +208,10 @@
>  		  <item>
>  		    <p>tests of ingenuity and logic</p>
>  		  </item>
> +		  <tag>Simulation</tag>
> +		  <item>
> +		    <p>real world simulations, like flight simulators
> +		  </item>
>  		  <tag>Sports</tag>
>  		  <item>
>  		    <p>games derived from "real world" sports</p>

I second this proposal.  In fact, I will second ANY proposal to add
ANYTHING to the menu heirarchy, no matter how stupid, just to help get
it beyond the needs-seconds stage and into the discussion stage, which
is where I think these proposals should start!  (Much like virtual
package names, which is what the menu policy was supposed to be
modelled on.)

cheers
-- 
Chris Waters           |  Pneumonoultra-        osis is too long
xtifr@debian.org       |  microscopicsilico-    to fit into a single
or xtifr@speakeasy.net |  volcaniconi-          standalone haiku

Attachment: pgpYAi9hqqXLN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: