Re: amendment to shared library policy
On Sun, 18 May 2003 20:05:53 -0400 (EDT), Jack Howarth
<howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> said:
> Yes, I guess it would be lintian, however I am under the
> impression that developers have to setup up their builds to use
> lintian (that is the output isn't automatically generated and mailed
> back to them). It would seem that we really should be stricter than
> making sanity checking shared libs as an option.
Umm, say what? How would adding it to debhelper make it
mandatory, or not optional?
manoj
--
The evil he has done himself and which had its origin and being in
himself breaks a fool, like a diamond breaks a precious stone. 161
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: