[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#191369: [PROPOSAL] encourage packagers to systematically prevent mis-linked libraries



On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:34:40AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ke, 2003-04-30 at 06:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It happens with unfortunate frequency that a shared library in the
> > archive will be built without linking against all the other libraries it
> > uses symbols from.

> Please allow me a stupid question early in the morning. This linking
> issue seems to be something that can be checked automatically. Does
> lintian check for it? Having such a check would probably be more
> effective than a policy change in getting things fixed, though the
> policy change sounds good too. (I'm not familiar enough with the issue,
> however, to formally second.)

As a side note, now that we're beginning to see ports based on other
libc's, it's increasingly likely that architecture variations could lead
to silent lib mis-builds even on a lintian-clean package; so the policy
change is important in its own right.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgp3p_s3KlRYQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: