Richard Braakman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:03:44PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I would personnally be fine with only: > > > > When scripts are installed into into a directory in the system PATH, > > the script name should not include an extension such as .sh or .pl > > that denotes the scripting language currently used to implement it. > > > > but I can easily be persuaded otherwise. > > I'd like a "just" or "simply" before the "denotes", otherwise > we'll get cheeky people arguing that naming a perl script "doit.sh" > is just fine :) I don't think either suggested word would restrain such a wise-alec, and it's probably not worth bloating policy with an airtight definition. Commen sense should serve.. (But then, if it did, I'd maybe not be proposing this..) -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpQDEaifU0XU.pgp
Description: PGP signature