Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
> > Not all of the statements made in that thread are not quite true,
> > and I seem to remember seeing some hacks done by Ukai-san on that
> > respect, for UTF-8.
>
> Hmmm...could you elaborate?
I think our man-db and groff have been hacked in two ways:
1) to special-case japanese locale (ja_JP.eucJP) and
act specially in that case only (using -Tnippon device)
2) to work with utf-8
I seem to remember 1 was the case in potato, or woody, breaking
use under ja_JP.utf-8.
2 was on its way, when I checked the last time, but I am not sure.
I think Colin Watson should know better about the status...
Reply to: