Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

To: 99933@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 22:46:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030104214625.GB18745@wiggy.net>
Reply-to: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>, 99933@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1041546314.22038.9.camel@space-ghost>
References: <[🔎] 1041476827.25298.32.camel@space-ghost> <[🔎] 20030102181206.GA24191@atlas15.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk> <[🔎] 1041533855.15063.19.camel@space-ghost> <[🔎] 1041546314.22038.9.camel@space-ghost>

Previously Colin Walters wrote:
> Opinions?

I second this proposal.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>           http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded
  - From: Radovan Garabik <garabik@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>
- Re: Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded
Next by Date: Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
Previous by thread: Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
Next by thread: Re: Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread