On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:25:06PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Branden> These appear to be equally valid arguments against all > Branden> other virtual packages in Debian. > > To mee this is simply an argument that the description entry in the > virtual packages list should be carefully written in this (and really > all other) case. Perhaps something like "DHCP clients compatible with > ifup/ifdown" This discussion appears to be irrelevant. None of the DHCP client maintainers has said, "yes, good idea, I'll do this", therefore it's dead in the water. I doubt that providing a description as you suggest will do anything to overcome Mark Brown's opposition to the idea. -- G. Branden Robinson | A committee is a life form with six Debian GNU/Linux | or more legs and no brain. branden@debian.org | -- Robert Heinlein http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpVoyAMH2yUl.pgp
Description: PGP signature