[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field

> What you want seems to be something that the Policy needs to regulate, I
> don't want to make Lintian require all that =?iso_8859-2? stuff and thus
> encourage people to use that. It's moot and the Policy doesn't explicitely
> mandate the format of the name.

I still think it already does, in D.2.4.

Reply to: