Bug#139437: marked as done (base-files: /usr/share/common-licenses should contain the FDL)
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:25:28 -0600
with message-id <87r8dn9zg7.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
and subject line The GFDL is not yet a common license
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2002 07:27:00 +0000
>From Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr Fri Mar 22 01:27:00 2002
Return-path: <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>
Received: from (localhost) [140.77.13.89]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16oJS0-0003m2-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 01:27:00 -0600
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16oB7b-0006MU-00; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 23:33:23 +0100
From: Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>
Subject: base-files: /usr/share/common-licenses should contain the FDL
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E16oB7b-0006MU-00@localhost>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 23:33:23 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: base-files
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
i've half a dozen version of the GNU Free Documentation License on my
harddisk. I think it would be a good thing to put it along with the other
licences.
Thanks, Mt.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux blaise 2.4.17 #1 Tue Jan 29 13:01:56 PST 2002 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages base-files depends on:
ii base-passwd 3.4.1 Debian Base System Password/Group Files
ii gawk 3.1.0-3 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and processing l
^^^ (Provides virtual package awk)
--- Begin /etc/inputrc (modified conffile)
set input-meta on
set output-meta on
set convert-meta off
set bell-style none
--- End /etc/inputrc
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139437-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2002 05:31:25 +0000
>From srivasta@golden-gryphon.com Thu Nov 14 23:31:24 2002
Return-path: <srivasta@golden-gryphon.com>
Received: from pcp559992pcs.rthfrd01.tn.comcast.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com) [68.52.105.148]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18CZ4e-00020t-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:31:24 -0600
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com (srivasta@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) with ESMTP id gAF5PU4J015102;
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:25:30 -0600
Received: (from srivasta@localhost)
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) id gAF5PS9q015098;
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:25:28 -0600
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I)
To: Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>, 139437-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: The GFDL is not yet a common license
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
(i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Thu Nov 14 23:25:28 2002
X-Face: #q.#]5@vq!Jz+E0t_/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:GA6o6W@I#deQL-%#.6]!z:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:25:28 -0600
Message-ID: <87r8dn9zg7.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 139437-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0
tests=NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
I would suggest that a so called common license should
actually be on, say 5% of the packages to be called common? Or even
1%? Since the GFDL is not yet close, this is not time for this
proposal.
manoj
--
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: