Bug#39830: [AMENDMENT]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:12:09PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:26:02PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-10-30 16:13:24.000000000 +0000
> > > +++ policy.sgml 2002-10-30 16:14:13.000000000 +0000
> > > @@ -7476,22 +7476,22 @@
> > [snip]
> > > + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If
> > ^^^^
> > you probably edited the wrong document, this should be should :).
> > or did I miss something?
> Yes, you missed this:
I didn't miss that.
> I would love to see seconds to, or discussions of, my most recent
> proposed diff:
this is the updated version where you removed the TODO.Debian
paragraph. and in this you have the must which I thought should
be a should according to the previous diff you sent. and just
afterwards you removed the TODO bit, hence it's a bit confusing.
> Chris Waters said he would renew his second if I changed "must" to
> "should", which I did. There have been several seconds to Roland's
> original proposal. Beyond that, the discussion period I proposed expires
> very soon!
yeah, I'ld second this one with s/must/should/.
clear now what i mean?