Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:20:14PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> + The system administrator should be able to delete files in
> + `/usr/share/doc' without causing any programs to break. A package
> + should not directly reference files that it places there.
Sure it should: ``further documentation may be found in
/usr/share/doc/foo''. Better would probably be to say "A package should
not require the existance of any files in /usr/share/doc to run." Which
is pretty much repeating yourself, if that matters.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: