Java policy
Hi
Now when woody is released I would like to propose that the
proposed java policy will be official.
Therefore I would like to have comments on it here so things
can be discussed. If you have a additional proposal please
also file a bug against java-common so I can remember it.
There are some things that might want to be added before it
becomes truly official.
See the policy at:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
* gcj and how to handle that (should it be mentioned at all?).
* should all virtual machines that provides a java2 virtual machine
also provide a 'java2' command (not 'java').
* How to handle jar dependencies? Should there be some kind of
mechanism for that?
Best regards,
// Ola
PS. Please continue this thread on debian-policy@l.d.o
and not just on debian-java@l.d.o.
DS.
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: