Re: [epg@progeny.com: Bug#154142: dhcp-client conflicts]
Previously Chris Waters wrote:
> If the merely-functional virtual packages were actually useless (which
> is essentially what you said), then I think we would be justified in
> throwing them out. But I don't think they are, so I don't think we
> are.
Ok. I think we are actually all in agreement now, Can someone please
volunteer to go through the list of virtual packages and document
them properly? For each virtual package we should document
* a description of what it should be used for
* a complete description of the interface packages should provide if
that is relevant for that virtual package
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: