Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
Branden> If:
Branden> * "Release critical bugs are _very_ rare."; and
Branden> * Release critical bugs should be the domain of the Release Manager,
Branden> Then we really don't need a tight connection between the
Branden> "serious" severity and release-criticality at all.
Branden> Release-criticality can be a tag -- whether that is
Branden> expressed in debbugs along with "security", "moreinfo",
Branden> "patch" and so forth or in a webpage like bugscan is
Branden> immaterial.
Branden> This tag -- no matter how it is expressed -- is the Release
Branden> Manager's domain. People can propose that a bug be treated
Branden> as release-critical and, perhaps, if it seems warranted, we
Branden> can make this a debbugs tag and possibly automatically set
Branden> it for all critical, grave, and serious bugs.
Branden> The Release Manager can strip the "release-critical" tag off
Branden> of any bug he wants. This is how things have *always*
Branden> worked in reality. If a bug is truly a showstopper for a
Branden> release, we don't release with it. We either wait, fix the
Branden> bug, or drop the package.
I find myself in strong and vehement agrement with Branden on
this point.
manoj
--
"I think the sky is blue because it's a shift from black through
purple to blue, and it has to do with where the light is. You know,
the farther we get into darkness, and there's a shifting of color of
light into the blueness, and I think as you go farther and farther
away from the reflected light we have from the sun or the light
that's bouncing off this earth, uh, the darker it gets ... I think if
you look at the color scale, you start at black, move it through
purple, move it on out, it's the shifting of color. We mentioned
before about the stars singing, and that's one of the effects of the
shifting of colors." Pat Robertson, The 700 Club
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>