Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:49:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you can't justify a change without reference to policy, then you
> shouldn't be suggesting it,
!?
No more wishlist bugs?
--
G. Branden Robinson | I've made up my mind. Don't try to
Debian GNU/Linux | confuse me with the facts.
branden@debian.org | -- Indiana Senator Earl Landgrebe
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpYXTjfnmLKi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>