On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > `Build-Depends', `Build-Conflicts'
> > The `Build-Depends' and `Build-Conflicts' fields must be
> > satisfied when any of the following targets is invoked: `build',
> > - `binary', `binary-arch' and `binary-indep'.
> > + `build-arch', `build-indep', `binary', `binary-arch' and
> > + `binary-indep'.
> Actually, it turns out that bug #72335 (accepted) already contained
> this, but that I didn't actually implement it in policy. So I'm going
> to add it after woody is released ('cos policy is frozen). But in the
> meantime, autobuilders would do well to use Build-Depends-Indep fields
> as well when running the build target (which is the main significant
> change here).
Uh, surely it'd need to be:
If you make "binary-arch" you need Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Arch
If you make "binary-indep" you need Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep
If you make "binary" you need all three
Which means autobuilders would need to use Build-Depends-Arch not
Build-Depends-Indep.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgpdUeCe8cuai.pgp
Description: PGP signature