[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#139957: period at the end of short description?



On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:10:14AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:

> +	    under 80 characters.  This should be a sentence fragment
> +	    which summarizes the key features provided by the package.
> +	    It should not end in a full stop (`.').

I'd rather have this be a guideline than a rule.  So, I'm not sure
policy is the right place.  (Sure wish we had someplace else where
guidelines could go.)  But if it does go in policy, I think "should"
might be too strong.

I'd rather have it specify a noun clause instead of a sentence
fragment (if we're going to specify anything).

I agree about the full stop.  (Although I still think "should" might
be too strong.)

If we're going to discuss leading caps or not, I agree with Branden:
not unless it would be capitalized for other reasons (i.e. "GNOME").

Maybe we can make it a footnote.  (Footnotes aren't normative, are
they?)

-- 
Chris Waters           |  Pneumonoultra-        osis is too long
xtifr@debian.org       |  microscopicsilico-    to fit into a single
or xtifr@speakeasy.net |  volcaniconi-          standalone haiku


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: