[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#139957: period at the end of short description?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:58:48AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>  Anthony> IMO, what policy is is a means of recording the current
>  Anthony> consensus on packaging issues amongst developers. It's
>  Anthony> necessary to have that written down somewhere rather than in
>  Anthony> everyone's heads, since there's so much of it and it's too
>  Anthony> easy to forget.
> 	Nearly 20% of the packages do not conform to this so called consensus.

Ah, so over 80% do.

If that's not a "consensus", then my grounds for fearing that you will
attempt to impose some sort of insanely high supermajority requirement
upon amendment of the Social Contract or DFSG are, perhaps, not so

Even a 4:1 supermajority is too low.  Amazing.

G. Branden Robinson                |     If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     about naked, we would have been
branden@debian.org                 |     born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpuuGi4EQS_g.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: