On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:58:48AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Anthony> IMO, what policy is is a means of recording the current > Anthony> consensus on packaging issues amongst developers. It's > Anthony> necessary to have that written down somewhere rather than in > Anthony> everyone's heads, since there's so much of it and it's too > Anthony> easy to forget. > > Nearly 20% of the packages do not conform to this so called consensus. Ah, so over 80% do. If that's not a "consensus", then my grounds for fearing that you will attempt to impose some sort of insanely high supermajority requirement upon amendment of the Social Contract or DFSG are, perhaps, not so ill-founded. Even a 4:1 supermajority is too low. Amazing. -- G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been branden@debian.org | born that way. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpuuGi4EQS_g.pgp
Description: PGP signature