[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#133096: marked as done (policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity.)



Your message dated 09 Feb 2002 15:24:46 +0000
with message-id <87g04azni9.fsf@tacitus.systems>
and subject line Bug#133096: policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2002 15:17:09 +0000
>From dancer@netfort.gr.jp Sat Feb 09 09:17:09 2002
Return-path: <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Received: from kfep05.dion.ne.jp [203.181.105.167] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16ZZFV-0000Am-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:17:09 -0600
Received: from vivare ([61.202.13.36]) by kfep05.dion.ne.jp with SMTP
          id <20020209151704072.REBR@kfep05.dion.ne.jp>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:17:04 +0900
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:10:07 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity.
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20020210001007.7e74230e.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0


Policy states that there is a 
Build-Depends field in the control file.
However, many packages use "Build-depends".

Most tools ignore the case, it might be helpful to clarify this point in
the policy.




-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 133096-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2002 15:24:54 +0000
>From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Sat Feb 09 09:24:54 2002
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from cicero.e-mis.co.uk [212.240.194.162] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16ZZN0-0000ml-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:24:54 -0600
Received: from tacitus.systems ([172.21.77.253] helo=tacitus)
	by cicero.e-mis.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ZZMt-0005CI-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 15:24:47 +0000
Received: from james by tacitus with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ZZMs-0000Wb-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 15:24:46 +0000
To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Cc: 133096-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#133096: policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity.
References: <[🔎] 20020210001007.7e74230e.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: 09 Feb 2002 15:24:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20020210001007.7e74230e.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Message-ID: <87g04azni9.fsf@tacitus.systems>
Lines: 23
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 133096-done@bugs.debian.org

Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:

> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.5.6.0
> 
> Policy states that there is a Build-Depends field in the control
> file.  However, many packages use "Build-depends".
> 
> Most tools ignore the case, it might be helpful to clarify this point in
> the policy.

| 3.1. Syntax of control files
| ----------------------------

[...] 

|      Field names are not case-sensitive, but it is usual to capitalize the
|      field names using mixed case as shown below.

Clarify what? :-P

-- 
James



Reply to: