Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:14:12PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> telnet-server is useful because it allows you to conflict with all the
> packages that run a telnetd. If your intent is for all radius daemons
> to conflict with radius-server, then I agree the the vp is useful.
>
After some discussion it seems correct to introduce a VP radius-server
as a provides-conflicts-replaces type of (a la sendmail & friends :)).
So if none has more objections I'll change in accepted this bug
and notify current maintainers for the new policy.
What's not clear to me is if new pkgs could be uploaded soon also
with policy frozen or they need to wait for policy update...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: