[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#109182: marked as done (Removing more historical cruft)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:57:51 -0300
with message-id <20010819165751.A2121@flower.cesarb>
and subject line I give up
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2001 01:39:20 +0000
>From cesarb@nitnet.com.br Sat Aug 18 20:39:20 2001
Return-path: <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br [200.255.111.241] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15YHYb-0000Bo-00; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:39:18 -0500
Received: (qmail 3684 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 01:50:24 -0000
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (HELO flower.cesarb) (200.198.84.62)
  by itaipu.nitnet.com.br with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 01:50:24 -0000
Received: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
	id 15YHY9-0001Q8-00; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:38:49 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Removing more historical cruft
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:38:49 -0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] E15YHY9-0001Q8-00@flower.cesarb>
Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@flower.cesarb>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: wishlist

Some time ago (ok, a lot of time ago), lots of things were changed in the
filesystem (I can particulary recall the gradual phasing-out and elimination of
/usr/tmp and /var/adm). Now I think it's time to go on and move some more
things.

There are a number of binaries which should go into /bin instead of /sbin or
/usr/sbin -- the full argument is at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200106/msg00878.html

I have only one thing to add to that list: traceroute should be moved, _not_ to
/usr/bin as lots of people claim, but to /bin . It's as necessary and useful as
ping to diagnose networking trouble, and /usr might be mounted via NFS through
a gateway -- exactly what we want to diagnose. Same for the ipv6 versions of
ping and traceroute.

For a counter-argument, look at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200106/msg00945.html
(which says only traceroute belongs to bin and not other tools like ifconfig).


To do it, the only needed things would be a small amount of relative symlinks.
After some releases (in Debian time, this means some years), most of the
symlinks would go away. Much like /usr/tmp and /var/adm.


If this is rejected, I still think that at least traceroute should be moved out
of /usr (whether it's /bin or /sbin doesn't matter much when the network is
down and /usr is NFS-mounted).

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flower 2.4.7 #1 Sat Jul 21 20:57:24 BRT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1

Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii  fileutils                     4.1-2      GNU file management utilities.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 109182-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2001 19:58:16 +0000
>From cesarb@nitnet.com.br Sun Aug 19 14:58:16 2001
Return-path: <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br [200.255.111.241] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15YYi4-0002ho-00; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 14:58:14 -0500
Received: (qmail 17863 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 20:09:31 -0000
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (HELO flower.cesarb) (200.198.84.62)
  by itaipu.nitnet.com.br with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 20:09:31 -0000
Received: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
	id 15YYhk-0000Yd-00
	for <109182-close@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:57:52 -0300
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:57:51 -0300
To: 109182-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: I give up
Message-ID: <20010819165751.A2121@flower.cesarb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
Delivered-To: 109182-close@bugs.debian.org


I filed this bug expecting a rational discussion about the moving of other
things to /bin (I already gave up on traceroute), like mke2fs (no, there's no
real reason why a normal user would want to create a disk image... Even if he
has write access to /dev/fd0 and could use dd to write it there... He also
can't run UML, so he really has no use for it...).

I'm closing this bug to prevent another flamewar like the last one in
debian-devel.

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@nitnet.com.br
cesarb@dcc.ufrj.br



Reply to: