Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
Anthony> Since people are already filing RC bugs about it:
Anthony> --- policy.sgml Sun Apr 29 05:10:09 2001
Anthony> +++ policy.sgml.std Fri May 11 11:10:09 2001
Anthony> @@ -1186,9 +1186,9 @@
Anthony> In the source package's <tt>Standards-Version</tt> control
Anthony> - field, you must specify the most recent version number of
Anthony> - this policy document with which your package complies.
Anthony> - The current version number is &version;.
Anthony> + field, you should specify the most recent version number of
Anthony> + this policy document with which your package complied when it
Anthony> + was last updated. The current version number is &version;.
I second this proposal.
manoj
- --
Mitchell's Law of Committees: Any simple problem can be made
insoluble if enough meetings are held to discuss it.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE6+2SsIbrau78kQkwRAfTKAKDgmbTmLv+Ht6KysYSS8p0Jy3K0pgCg9LTC
QaxBy3JeC3P0Ty4dd7zCLvw=
=2ThV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: