On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:31:30AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Reading the rest of the thread, I sense there's a consnsensus that it'd be
> ok to file such bugs if they weren't rc, at least. So 578 priority
> normal bugs coming right up unless someone tells me otherwise.
I'm sure you've got a better idea than I do where lintian's up to at the
moment, but, if it's possible, it'd probably be helpful to also include
all the lintian errors in a package (or at least an "interesting" subset
thereof), and making it `serious' iff some of those errors are against
MUST clauses...
Or not. Whatever.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgprdpuXjizGz.pgp
Description: PGP signature