[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?



On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:19:42AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > aj, who'll be proposing the MUST/SHOULD nonsense be removed from the hands
> >     of policy when he gets some free time again
> I play the evil maintainer who does everything with his packages that
> isn't forbidden.
> We could set some goals, e.g. I win when I get three packages statically
> linked against libc (the idea comes from the thread about gnumeric

And I win when I get you kicked out of the project for good?

How about we not play stupid games using our users as pawns in stupid
debates, and just get on with *writing some code*.

When you find some idiots who don't have good reasons for applying
prewritten patches to make their packages install noninteractively,
we'll talk.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
   C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
    can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
		-- Mike Hoye,
		      see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt

Attachment: pgpTmxMdbFVBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: