Processed: Proposal accepted

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Cc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org (#72335), Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>(debian-policy #72335)
Subject: Processed: Proposal accepted
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 18:18:28 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.9921285002846.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20010610001438.A9596@polya>
References: <20010610001438.A9596@polya>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 72335 debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Bug#72335: [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to debian-policy@lists.debian.org.

> retitle 72335 [ACCEPTED 10/6/2001] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Bug#72335: [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Processed: Reassign back to lintian
Next by Date: Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries
Previous by thread: Processed: Reassign back to lintian
Next by thread: Bug#34223: Bug#24223: apt and packaging manual are in contradiction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread