these proposals becoming amendments

[Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>]

# seconded by "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325144632.D14144@ysabell.wh.vaih>
# seconded by Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325214339.B19653@marvin.palfrader.org>
# seconded by cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson) in Message-ID <[🔎] E14hGuH-0007hG-00@riva.ucam.org>
close 91249
reopen 91249
retitle 91249 [AMENDMENT 25/03/2001] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage

# seconded by "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325140943.A14144@ysabell.wh.vaih>
# seconded by hmh@debian.org in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325170344.C24858@godzillah>
close 91259
reopen 91259
retitle 91259 [AMENDMENT 25/03/2001] minor changes to app-defaults policy

# seconded by "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325141859.B14144@ysabell.wh.vaih>
# seconded by hmh@debian.org in Message-ID <[🔎] 20010325170109.B24858@godzillah>
close 91260
reopen 91260
retitle 91260 [AMENDMENT 25/03/2001] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

thanks

I hereby propose a 10-day formal discussion period for these amendments, per
Policy Process 3.5.

I cannot GPG-sign this message because the bot at control@bugs.debian.org
is too stupid.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |         Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux                |         I met a man who wasn't there.
branden@debian.org              |         He wasn't there again today,
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |         I think he's from the CIA.