[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage



On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:11:00PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> writes:
> >  bah.  The binary is 3 MB large.  The package is 28 MB large.  You could
> >  leave the X-capable binary in emacs20 and move everything else,
> >  including a terminal only emacs-20.7 binary to emacs20-base or
> >  emacs20-text or something like that.  Or you could add one more package
> >   and have emacs20, emacs20-common and emacs20-text.  
> 
>      This is one of the most constructive suggestions I have ever
> heard on this list.  If it were a proposal I would second it
> instantly.

In the meantime, would anyone care to second the proposal that is actually
pending?  :(

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |
Debian GNU/Linux                |   If God had intended for man to go about
branden@debian.org              |   naked, we would have been born that way.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpgxsbagett9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: