On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:07:40PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:08:30AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > * Some rewording to reflect the new must/should/may policy. > > BTW, I'm inclined to think it'd be a good idea for people who want to add > a "must" requirement (or to change a should to a must) to include a list of > packages that would need to be removed from the distribution due to the > change. Anyone agree/disagree? I disagree. This list doesn't overrun with policy proposals. The traffic level is fairly low. Your proposal would only serve to discourage people like me who are (or try to be) fairly knowledgeable about the issues from making policy proposals in the first place. Or maybe that's the idea...hmmm... -- G. Branden Robinson | A great work of art has never caused any Debian GNU/Linux | social problems. Social problems are branden@debian.org | caused by those trying to protect http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | society from great works of art.
Attachment:
pgpsUwqK8Rdce.pgp
Description: PGP signature