Re: Package documentation
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 09:01:23AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> IMO, it should say "packages SHOULD change the docs to match the package
> setup", and "there MUST be a disclaimer when docs do not match the
> package", and "the disclaimer SHOULD be in the upstream doc itself, or in
> a the README.Debian if not".
Give me a break. You want a package removed from the archive, just
because it doesn't have a disclaimer about buggy docs?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: