Re: should vs must
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: should vs must
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Date: 01 Mar 2001 00:25:54 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87hf1ef1jh.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- In-reply-to: <20010227105359.B30491@azure.humbug.org.au> (Anthony Towns's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:53:59 +1000")
- References: <20010225014140.A5183@polya> <20010225141840.B30795@gaia.iki.fi> <20010225144024.D30795@gaia.iki.fi> <20010225125914.A22241@polya> <20010226001655.A25066@azure.humbug.org.au> <tslr90lc9zd.fsf_-_@sweet-transvestite.mit.edu> <20010226232541.A18610@polya> <20010227105359.B30491@azure.humbug.org.au>
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
Anthony> I'm stronly against putting things about the future in policy. That
Anthony> might not be rational, but we'll see. That said...
I concur, for what it is worth.
manoj
--
When in doubt, do what the President does -- guess.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: