On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 03:04:32AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 11:57:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Or we could go back to how the packaging manual says it: > > This file is usually an executable makefile, and contains packages > > specific recipes for compiling the package and building binary > > package(s) out of the source. > s/packages\nspecific/package-specific/ Right. (The "usually" was added, btw) > Yes but > It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f, so that it can be invoked > by saying its name rather than invoking make explicitly. > is quite make-specific, and it includes a "must". This would have to be > reworded. ``This file must be able to be invoked by saying its name rather than invoking make explicitly. This can be done (for makefiles) by having the first line be #!/usr/bin/make -f.'' > What does the old packaging manual say here, is it different? Nope. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpqaJp4sx9ts.pgp
Description: PGP signature