Bug#87233: wording in section 9.2.2 could be better

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#87233: wording in section 9.2.2 could be better
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:32:17 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200102231332.f1NDWHK02565@fog.mors.wiggy.net>
Reply-to: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>, 87233@bugs.debian.org

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: normal

The wording used in the footnote for section 9.2.2 could be better. It
seems to have been copied from an email I send to debian-devel and
debian-policy a while ago and which was never meant for verbatim
inclusion in the policy manual, For example the example it uses is not
current anymore.

Wichert.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fog 2.2.18ext3 #1 Tue Feb 13 01:36:06 CET 2001 i686

Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii  fileutils                     4.0.37-1   GNU file management utilities.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#87233: wording in section 9.2.2 could be better
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#76868: PROPOSED] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Next by Date: Bug#76868: PROPOSED] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Previous by thread: Bug#76868: PROPOSED] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Next by thread: Bug#87233: wording in section 9.2.2 could be better
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread