Re: Bug#87159: explanation of Build-Depends et. al. is unclear
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Specifically, [!i386 m68k] seems like it could be valid, but seems to not be.
> The archs are also whitespace separated, some people are using commas. Perhaps
> an exmple with multiple arches would be good.
It is supported by APT..
Python 1.5.2 (#0, Apr 5 2000, 04:40:10) [GCC 2.95.2 20000313 (Debian GNU/Linux)] on linux2
>>> import apt_pkg
>>> apt_pkg.init()
>>> apt_pkg.Config["APT::Architecture"] = "m68k"
>>> apt_pkg.ParseSrcDepends("apt (> 1.0) [!i386 m68k]");
[[('apt', '1.0', '>=')]]
>>> apt_pkg.Config["APT::Architecture"] = "i386"
>>> apt_pkg.ParseSrcDepends("apt (> 1.0) [!i386 m68k]");
[]
>>> apt_pkg.Config["APT::Architecture"] = "sparc"
>>> apt_pkg.ParseSrcDepends("apt (> 1.0) [!i386 m68k]");
[]
Which seems to be correct.
Jason
Reply to: