Re: Is the stable/unstable split broken?

[Brian May <bam@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Palmer <mjp16@ieee.uow.edu.au> writes:

    Matthew> If you're thinking of creating a meta-package called
    Matthew> 'stable' which depends on the stable version of every
    Matthew> package, typing apt-get upgrade stable will install every

How big would the depends: line get? then again, don't answer that...

    Matthew> single package listed therein.  Does anyone else have a
    Matthew> problem with that?

I suppose that is meant to be the difference between

apt-get upgrade stable

and

apt-get install stable

?

<yuck scream="ARgghhh!" protection="Runs for cover"/>
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>