Re: Bug#83669: Shared libraries
Hi,
We seem to be balancing 300MB for all archives, mirrors,
transfers, CD's, everyone downloading packages, etc, against the
requirements of a few developers who need to create debs for
libraries older than those they are running? And who could always
create a chroot jail for themselves (I can provide a chroot creation
script for those who shall argue that this is too hard).
For me, this seems a no brainer, that we don't need the
bloat. I agree that laziness is a good programmer trait, but this is
taking it too far.
Or am I missing the major advantage that over rides the bloat
argument?
manoj
--
There's no future in time travel.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: