Re: Finger daemons in Debian should use a virtual package
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:43:51AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
>
> no, it's cfingerd that it broken - it happily removes entries, not noticing
> if they were made by cfingerd or anything else (at least did when I was
> packaging efingerd, a long time ago)
> Or is this preferrable behaviour?
That doesn't seem to correspond to what's in cfingerd's prerm. Although
it is buggy in that it shouldn't enable itself if there's already a finger
service there.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: