Re: Bug#54968: Lintian, archive maintenance and and policy

[Matthew Vernon <matthew@sel.cam.ac.uk>]

Wichert Akkerman writes:
 > Previously Matthew Vernon wrote:
 > > I think also the principle of only rejecting uploads with RC bugs in
 > > is important (ignoring the flamefests elsewhere about whether or not
 > > you think maintainers should spend their lives dotting all the is and
 > > t's or producing slightly buggy packages with whatever time they have)
 > > - if it's not RC, then the package would be releasable, so has
 > > contributed in a positive manner to Debian, so should not be rejected.
 > 
 > In the case of adns the way it is packaged would be reason enough to
 > file a release-critical bug on it, as you have been told in the latest
 > rejection message. The fact that there is no release critical bug at
 > the moment is only because it hasn't been accepted in the distribution
 > yet.

Which error are you referring to?

Matthew

-- 
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org