[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#79048: marked as done (Virtual package: c++-compiler)



Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:56:37 +0000
with message-id <20001219115637.D18834@polya>
and subject line Bug#79048: Virtual package: c++-compiler
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2000 22:13:04 +0000
>From J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk Thu Dec 07 16:13:04 2000
Return-path: <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Received: from mserv1d.vianw.co.uk [195.102.240.96] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1449Hf-0004eI-00; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:12:59 -0600
Received: from [195.102.198.206] (helo=polya)
	by mserv1d.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #36)
	id 1449HY-00001R-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:12:52 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 1447kH-0008R6-00; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:34:25 +0000
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:34:24 +0000
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
To: Debian bug reports <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Virtual package: c++-compiler
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20001207203424.A32418@polya>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.0
Severity: wishlist

We should have a c++-compiler virtual package to match the c-compiler
package.  At present, at least in potato, only g++ Provides this
virtual package, but there may be others.  And policy should encode
current practice.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79048-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2000 12:16:32 +0000
>From J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk Tue Dec 19 06:16:32 2000
Return-path: <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Received: from mserv1c.vianw.co.uk [195.102.240.33] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 148Lh1-0001yl-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 06:16:31 -0600
Received: from [195.102.196.81] (helo=polya)
	by mserv1c.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
	id 148Lgx-0000c4-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:16:28 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 148LNl-0004uK-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:56:37 +0000
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:56:37 +0000
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Cc: 79048-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#79048: Virtual package: c++-compiler
Message-ID: <20001219115637.D18834@polya>
References: <[🔎] 20001207203424.A32418@polya> <[🔎] 87y9xo0zg4.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20001211000138.A32397@polya> <[🔎] 87hf4b56j5.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20001211205114.E1701@polya> <[🔎] 87wvcz2hwd.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 87wvcz2hwd.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>; from srivasta@debian.org on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 09:21:06AM -0600
Delivered-To: 79048-done@bugs.debian.org

On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 09:21:06AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
> 
>  Julian> OK, you've convinced me.  But now, what should I Recommend when I want
>  Julian> to recommend a C++ compiler?  g++, because it's the only one we have,
>  Julian> or c++-compiler, given that it is already Provided by g++?
> 
> 	I think the accepted practice is real pkg | generic/virtual pkg;
>  so the line should read:
> Recommends: g++ | c++-compiler

OK, shall do.  And I'll close this virtual package request as well.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/



Reply to: