Re: changing priorities
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 15 December 2000 13:58, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For woody, it'd be nice if we could use the Priority field consistently.
> What do people think of something like:
[snip]
> common (new)
> -- Everything that can be installed without going into
> dselect. Emacs, TeX, X, Gnome, KDE, Abiword, whatever.
> All the task- packages.
>
> optional
> -- Everything else people might reasonably be interested in
Hmmm. It would be very difficult (mainly for maintaners) to classify some
packages as "Optional" in such case. "Commom" sounds much better than
"Optional" for me and, according to your examples of "common" packages,
maintaners may always prefer "Common" as a priority for their packages.
BTW, do you think WindowMaker or Englightenment packages should have
priorities "Common" in such case?
- --
Mariusz Przygodzki | Good judgement comes from experience.
dune@home.pl | Experience comes from bad judgement.
http://www.dune.home.pl |
GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771
GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjo6I1sACgkQviuWXEL613HaHACeI+tI8srmw0/0LvHb6ngjpwbh
k1MAnj9A61Q+eToHYs5+1QjQtZL/qD7U
=l1ut
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: