Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> 1) Linux binaries can be run on many non-Linux systems, like BSD,
Thomas> which might not have any copy of the GPL.
These BSD systems do not use GNU binaries? no gcc? no make? no
flex? bison? bash?
Could you please name the BSD that fits this definition?
Thomas> 2) The license says it must be given with the binaries.
Find me a single Debian archive/ Official CD image that does
not also contain the GPL that can be pulled.
Is not the package containing the GPL an essential package?
manoj
--
I never said all Democrats were saloonkeepers; what I said was all
saloonkeepers were Democrats.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: