On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Reimer, Fred wrote: > Why would they want to do this? I usually run a completely unstable system, > that is rather stable BTW, so don't understand why someone who runs a stable > system would want to "lie" about a package being stable when, in fact, it is It isn't lieing, it is a simple matter that stable has a different libc so any binary compiled on unstable must be recompiled on stable. Jason