[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New field proposed, UUID

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Ben Collins wrote:

> > Mmkay...  9 Gb mirror pulse...  that will work.  (not)
> That's a seperate issue that does not pertain to the UUID's. Let's discuss
> this later.

Er, so far the only reason to have a UUID that has held up to scrutiny
revolves around whatever your signing plan is - if your signing plan is 
going to fail because in requires a 9 gig mirror pulse then we don't
need UUIDs! 

Post your scheme and we can evaluate it (and its required UUIDs) as a


Reply to: