[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#77650: outdated references to FHS



Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.0

There are a few outdated references to the FHS in the Policy Manual.
The appended patch cleans up those I found.

Matt

--- policy.sgml.orig	Tue Nov 21 10:41:49 2000
+++ policy.sgml	Tue Nov 21 11:20:08 2000
@@ -1136,12 +1136,7 @@
 	    comply  with the Linux File system Hierarchy Standard
 	    (FHS).  The latest version of this document can be found
 	    alongside this manual or on
-	    <url id="http://www.pathname.com/fhs/";>.<footnote>
-	      <p>The Debian distribution currently distributes a draft
-		version of FHS 2.1 because several significant details
-		have changed between the currently released 2.0
-		version and the to-be-released 2.1 version.</p>
-	    </footnote>
+	    <url id="http://www.pathname.com/fhs/";>.
 	    Specific questions about following the standard may be
 	    asked on <prgn>debian-devel</prgn>, or referred to Daniel
 	    Quinlan, the FHS coordinator, at
@@ -1169,9 +1164,9 @@
 	    <tt>/usr/local</tt>, not <em>in</em>
 	    <tt>/usr/local</tt>. Packages must not create sub-directories 
 	    in the directory <tt>/usr/local</tt> itself, except those listed in
-	    FHS, section 4.6. However, you may create directories
+	    FHS, section 4.5. However, you may create directories
 	    below them as you wish. You must not remove any of the
-	    directories listed in 4.6, even if you created them.</p>
+	    directories listed in 4.5, even if you created them.</p>
 	    
 	  <p>
 	    Since <tt>/usr/local</tt> can be mounted read-only from a
@@ -3191,8 +3186,8 @@
 	  
 	<p>
 	  The <prgn>rmail</prgn> program used by UUCP
-	  for incoming mail should be  <tt>/usr/sbin/rmail</tt>, as per the
-	  FHS.  Likewise, <prgn>rsmtp</prgn>, for receiving
+	  for incoming mail should be  <tt>/usr/sbin/rmail</tt>.
+	  Likewise, <prgn>rsmtp</prgn>, for receiving
 	  batch-SMTP-over-UUCP, should be <tt>/usr/sbin/rsmtp</tt> if it
 	  is supported.</p>
 	  



Reply to: