Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
> > > What about the /usr/doc/foo
> > > symlink -- is foo-doc going to take care of that? What if I later
> > > install foo? Who gets to remove the link?
> > I don't know, but this kludge is a secondary thing, and should not be
> > considered when making policy. Any policy will last longer than these
> > symlinks.
> Uuh, those symlinks *are* in policy. You can't just ignore them.
I know, but they are there just for a while... we shouldn't bend other
policies because of those synlinks IMO.
Reply to: